Is that a good defence? The answer will change depending on which side of the line you are. But reality tells us that across the world, corporates often failed to live up to high ethical standard when the going got difficult for them. The case of Enron, Financial Crisis in US and Europe, Global Trust bank, Satyam and many more in India tells us that there are far too many instances to gloss over.
It is common knowledge that in any electoral democracy, the cost of electoral campaign is borne out of corporate donation to a large extent. Now why would a company donate for a candidate? In the corporate world free lunch as a concept does not exist, let alone a freeloader. So when a company spends money on a candidate it is imperative that it expects something in return and there the story follows. Further corporate dole follows dole to the company through Govt. policies and omission of statutiory procedures. Gradually the symbiosis between corporates, bureaucracy and political powers grows and slowly takes over every function of Govt. aparatus. There you have a working model of modern-day electoral democracy.
It is obvious that without a cleaner corporate governance, the nation cannot aspire to bring down the menace of corruption. How does the Indian corporate sector look at this issue? Here we have the 2010 survey report titled "Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Indian Corporates" from KPMG and ASSOCHAM. One of the startling data that this report throws is
- 75% of the audience said that Fraud in Corporate India is rising
- 45% said that suspected/actual Fraud in their organizations are rising
It clearly identified that in India both regulation and ethical standard is less stringent and is a weakness in the system. This table provides an intersting comparison between India and US [borrowed]
Aspect of Governance | India | US |
Board Performance evaluation | Recommended | Mandatory |
Whistle blowing | Recommended | Mandatory |
Executive sessions of Independent Directors | | Mandatory |
Disclosure of Board/committee charters | | Mandatory |
Majority Independent Directors | 50% only if the CEO is board of Chair | Mandatory |
The report ended with few recommendations. Many of those are about incorporating and strengthening Independent board members. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has proposed the New Companies Bill which aims to improve corporate governance by vesting greater powers in shareholders. Additionally the proposed Companies Bill heralds an era of shareholder democracy through an emphasis on self regulation, minimization of regulatory approvals and, increased and more transparent disclosures.
Shareholder activism is unheard of in Indian context but that is the way forward if we are to get rid of corruption/unethical practises in corporate sector. Here the middleclass really can make a lot of difference since most of the corporate workers belong to this section of the society.
No comments:
Post a Comment